ACT for PTSD in Early Psychosis: A Case Series – paper published

My Danish colleague, Jens Einar Jansen, has published a paper with me, where we argue that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) shows promise in helping people recovering from a first episode of psychosis who have trauma symptoms (using a case series):

Jansen, J.E., & Morris, E.M.J. 2016. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Early Psychosis: A Case Series. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2016.04.003


Persons with psychosis often report high levels of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, which render them more vulnerable to relapse, symptom exacerbation, and reduced well-being. However, less is known about how to adequately accommodate the needs of persons recovering from a first episode of psychosis, presenting with PTSD. Further, the existing evidence-based interventions for PTSD seem less equipped to deal with serious mental illness and comorbid conditions. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for persons suffering from PTSD with comorbid trauma and psychosis. Three consecutively referred participants meeting ICD-10 criteria for PTSD and a first-episode nonaffective psychotic disorder were treated in an outpatient service within a case-series analysis. A manual-guided ACT intervention of 12 sessions showed clinically relevant improvement on self-report measures of PTSD symptoms and emotional distress. These initial findings are promising and appear to justify a more controlled evaluation of this brief intervention.

A pre-pub version of the paper is available here.

In the paper we outline the challenges in providing psychological therapies to people recovering from early psychosis when they have trauma symptoms. We share how the transdiagnostic ACT model may provide ways to work safely and effectively with these clients, including the use of exposure informed by a psychological flexibility approach. We describe how using metaphors, perspective taking and mindfulness may support committed action for clients that is recovery-focused. This is demonstrated through a case series of three clients who engaged in ACT in an early psychosis service. These uncontrolled observations are promising: further investigation with greater methodological rigour is warranted.


Building a life that is rich, fulfilling and fun – Joe Oliver on “ACTivate Your Life”

rulebookJoe Oliver, co-author of ACTivate Your Life, was recently interviewed on the Open Forwards podcast. The interview was hosted by Jim Lucas (founder and managing director of Open Forwards, a consultancy based in Birmingham, UK).

In the interview Joe talks about what attracted him to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) as a model: the empirical development, an international community of like-minded people, and the usefulness of the ACT skills in his own life:

…the thing that stood out to me is , it was in the word acceptance which is a really unusual word, it is catchy, it is provocative  and it is hard to grapple with. The thing that unfolds for me is was this peace. It was kind of like, offering this suggestion maybe that the struggle wasn’t always necessary. And that was just a revolutionary idea for me personally. And perhaps noticing the times of my life where I was struggling against stuff, I was fighting things. Just a suggestion maybe that there is another way to approach this  stuff, It was really fascinating.

In the interview Joe outlines how the skills of being open, aware and active may help when we get stuck in life’s problems.

In ACTivate Your Life we describe how these skills are already present… but may be underused, as we get caught up in our mind’s messages and struggles.

Joe also describes the process of how we tackled writing the book, with the goal of creating an accessible ACT self-help guide.

Working as a trio to develop our ideas and find a consistent style was an important part of the process:

Joe:  It is not only important to have the right ideas but have a way to tell these ideas in a consistent voice. It is important to kind of get across as well. For example Eric and myself, we come from kind of an academic background, writing academic papers. We might come out as a little dry and dusty. For example Jon [Hill: our co-author], he has done tons of writing. He is definitely a wordsmith, he is I think the world’s…as far as I know only video game poet, which gives you an indication of his writing abilities. Bring that all together, different styles, getting a consistent voice was important,

Jim Lucas:  It is a good measure of a book where you can’t tell the writers apart through the chapters, because the writing style is so similar.

Of course, we also made sure that the book had great illustrations, and references to zombies, disaster movies, and Frank Zappa (!).

I encourage you to listen to the podcast, it is a fun conversation, and available here.

Thanks to Jim Lucas and Open Forwards for this great interview!

If you’d like to check out the first chapter of ACTivate Your Life, it is available here.


clinical RFT is here, and now – A review of “Mastering the Clinical Conversation”

mastering clinical conversationMastering the Clinical Conversation: Language as Interventionwas published in late 2015 by Guilford Press. The book’s authors, Matt Villatte, Jennifer Villatte, and Steven Hayes, have produced, in my opinion, the first clinical Relational Frame Theory (RFT) manual that is both immediately useful to clinicians, and repays with deeper study and repeated readings. The manual will be of interest to researchers and clinicians concerned with the empirical development of psychotherapies, and therapists seeking to understand how therapeutic interactions can be enhanced by using contemporary behavioural principles.  [For the remainder of this review I will use the abbreviation “MtCC” to refer to the book.]

MtCC presents a wholly functionally-analytic approach to psychotherapy, based on a basic science account of language and cognition. The book’s integrative presentation means that the principles described are relevant to the practice of various psychotherapies, including cognitive-behavioural, systemic, humanistic and psychodynamic approaches (more on this later).


MtCC was a hotly-anticipated title within the contextual behavioural science community, partly as there was the promise of a clinically-oriented RFT handbook, that was not an “ACT book”, and also because of the word-of-mouth buzz generated by the training workshops that Matt and Jenn Villatte had been giving over the previous 3 years.

These workshops, presenting what could be done with clinical RFT, demonstrated that interventions may be developed directly from using relational framing principles. All without requiring a model like Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, or using middle-level terms.

I was fortunate enough to participate in a workshop Matt led in London in 2013, hosted by the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies. This workshop was well-attended by a diverse audience of clinicians and academics (along with ACT aficionados, there were participants across theoretical orientations, from cognitive therapists, solution-focused and systemic therapists, behaviour therapists, to humanistic and psychodynamic therapists: it felt quite unusual to have such an eclectic crowd for an event hosted by a CBT organisation).

The workshop was excellent. Over two days Matt demonstrated how RFT could provide from the ground up a way of conceptualising problems functionally and working with clients with greater precision in therapeutic language, using various types of relational framing. This was beyond the usual work presented to clinicians about RFT’s relevance, such as in the development of apt metaphors… this was seeing the therapeutic context wholly through a RFT lens.

What was equally impressive was the integrative nature of the training: while behavioural in focus, there were links made across a range of psychotherapies regarding the use of language to achieve therapeutic aims. It could be observed, in fact, that there was very little over the 2 days that was “ACT” at all: it was much more about understanding (in RFT terms) practices in mainstream, established approaches or speaking about the generic tasks and goals of therapy.

So, my hopes were high that MtCC may reflect my workshop experience of clinical RFT.

“Accessible RFT”

Since the 2001 publication of original RFT book (dubbed “Purple Hayes” due to the cover design, and possibly also for the experience that the text has on the reader(!): an infamously dense and complex manuscript), there has been a pressing need for readable texts to introduce RFT to non-academics. Two preceding texts, “Learning RFT” and “The ABCs of Human Behavior”, have been excellent efforts at tackling this, particularly by describing the effects of rule-governed behaviour and then presenting the properties and implications of relational framing.

MtCC presents a further refinement. It is an accessible introduction to RFT, oriented to clinical situations. MtCC stands on the shoulders of the RFT books that preceded it, capably presenting relational learning in a digestible way for the general reader. It helps that the principles described in the first few chapters, are then expanded upon throughout the remaining ones, meaning that the reader has plenty of clinical examples to become fluent in the functional way that MtCC describes psychotherapy.

The initial chapters describe the basic principles of how language evolved as a unique form of learning, and the ways that it can lead to problems and challenges (along with advantages).

The authors present their definition of language – “the learned behavior of building and responding to symbolic relations” – and unpack this to help the reader understand the book’s stance.

First, language is about relating.  It is a skill that applies beyond words, to any way that symbols can be related. And, at least for humans, this skill includes relating in ways based on social whim (rather than just to the inherent properties of the object being related). The authors argue this makes it possible for ”everything to mean anything”.

Second, language is learned: the authors discuss how it is the only learning process that is itself learned, and that once learned it alters all other forms of learning. Due to the ubiquity of symbolic relating, therapists are working with language, even when they use methods such as inducing silence, mindfulness, hypnosis or imagery. The authors make the case that knowing the behavioural principles suggested by RFT may help clinicians to work with a broad range of clinical problems in a coherent and efficient way, regardless of their clinical tradition.

“The conversations that happen in psychotherapy and other clinical interactions are, in part, a process of learning how to manage relational frames and the contextual cues that regulate them in the service of living well”

The third chapter is key, presenting a framework for using language in therapy and considering the tools (relational frames) that can be used clinically. The chapter orientates the reader to how change may occur: therapists work to alter the client’s symbolic context in various ways. Rather than attempting to remove experiences, the therapist is encouraging the client to be more sensitive to the useful aspects of their experiences, in order to broadening and build behavioural repertoires.

The authors describe overarching goals (promoting flexible sensitivity to context, and functional coherence) and a strategy (altering contexts, so that transformation of symbolic functions occurs). Helping clients to be more in contact with their experience in a broader way may enable more effective behaviours to be chosen (flexible sensitivity to context). Doing so from a stance of wholeness and effectiveness (functional coherence), may allow the client’s experiences to be integrated flexibly and their actions to be in the service of meaningful living. This chapter is a fundamental statement of the focus of therapy and sets the scene for the remainder of the book.

“Without sensitivity to variations in the context, a single observation turns into a rule, a thought into a belief, a memory into a story, an emotion into a mood, and a behavior into a habit”

The fourth chapter outlines how to use RFT principles in the assessment of psychological problems. A central idea is to conduct the assessment from the client’s perspective, to support their ability to observe their own behaviours and how they are influenced (so repertoires are already being broadened in the assessment phase!). This is a necessarily collaborative process, that may involve the use of metaphors and perspective taking to connect what is happening outside of therapy, with what is happening in the therapeutic relationship. The way assessment is described in this chapter is as an augmentation of what would be done within the therapist’s theoretical orientation. The reader is encouraged to consider how they would assess context sensitivity and coherence alongside the processes important to their model.

The remainder of the book then has chapters that describe clinical methods for:

  • activating and shaping behaviour change,
  • building a flexible sense of self,
  • fostering meaning and motivation,
  • creating powerful experiential metaphors, and
  • strengthening the therapeutic relationship.

Each clinical methods chapter has a similar structure: introducing the general approach, which is then divided into various component skills.  For each component skill there is an outline of the therapeutic goal, why it is important from a RFT perspective, how it links with various clinical traditions, and how to do it (with example therapeutic exchanges). Several component skills are discussed in this way, before the chapter concludes with a clinical example, with an extended vignette and description of the intended functions that the therapist is trying to develop. Each chapter ends with a summary of the principles to remember for the particular skill (this content is also listed at the very end of the book, in the “Quick guide to using RFT in psychotherapy”).

The clinical examples presented illustrate the principles well. More so, they have a quality of verisimilitude: they do sound like the types of conversations heard in the therapy room. In my experience, this is unusual in therapy manuals, many times example therapeutic conversations can read as a little too contrived. The authors notes on what the therapist intends with a particular response are instructive and reinforce the chapter points.


As strong as MtCC is, it is not to say that the text cannot be criticised. For one, I have heard a view that publishing this book is premature: there is still a lot more experimental RFT research required before reliable statements can be made about certain types of relational framing. I see this as a tension between the (necessary) goal of doing basic science, and presenting the implications of this research for applied settings.

What may surprise the casual reader is the amount of RFT research that has been done over the last 15 years. The authors do a great job in describing how this research has implications for psychotherapy in general, rather than just for contextual approaches like ACT. Like any empirically-based approach, there are likely to components presented in MtCC that will be revised and refined with further research. Producing a treatment manual at this point, to outline RFT’s usefulness to the clinician, seems an important goal in its own right.

A second criticism I have heard is that the book is not “functional enough”, and that what is being presented is a form of “topographical RFT”. It is accurate that the approach described in the text does not involve doing a “true” functional analysis – controlled experimentation of the manipulable aspects of the client’s environment – however, there are a variety of conceptual and practical reasons which functional analysis is not done in this way in clinical practice (Haynes & O’Brien, 1990; Hayes & Follette, 1992, 1993). In many psychotherapy settings it is not possible to spend extended periods engaged in this form of experimental analysis: amongst other reasons, few clients will have the patience for such an enterprise.

I think in MtCC the authors have struck the right balance, presenting assessment of sensitivity to context and coherence as additional facets of what the therapist would be doing when developing a formulation. There are certainly a number of methods and ideas discussed in Chapter 4 about how to do assessment, even if it cannot be said (yet) that functional analysis using RFT is definitively described. I have no doubt that in the coming years there will be other clinical RFT books published, from different authors, with other approaches to assessment and conceptualisation. It is the early days of clinical RFT.

Resources and Strengths

This book is supported by a wealth of online materials. The reader can expand their learning by exploring the website devoted to the book (, where there are many video resources that illustrate the principles, along with demonstrations of the therapeutic methods. There is also an active Facebook group to support learning.

A strength this book has is the authors’ efforts at integration, across various therapeutic models. This integration is not “anything goes” eclecticism, but rather one of considering functionally the processes of various psychotherapeutic methods. More than any other contextual text, there is a deliberate move of building bridges.

An example here is the intelligent discussion of behavioural experiments, cognitive reappraisal, and exposure, within a RFT frame (yep, pun intended). It is an interesting empirical question: when is it useful clinically to expand relational networks (such as with reappraisal or behavioural experiments) as a primary focus (compared to, say, undermining them experientially)?  One hopes that the book’s impact  is that it encourages RFT-informed clinical research that moves the field beyond therapy “brands” (e.g. ACT, CBT, and the rest of the alphabet soup), and generates useful principles that benefit all.


In my view, MtCC is a milestone work in contextual behavioural science and clinical behaviour analysis. I think it stands alongside the original guide to Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP; a foundational text), in providing a behaviour analytic understanding of psychotherapy. Similar to the FAP text, the principles described could be used to augment existing therapeutic approaches. In contrast to the FAP text, MtCC presents a post-Skinnerian approach to psychotherapy, illustrating how understanding the principles of reinforcement are important within the context of the transforming qualities of relational responding.

Time will tell about the impact of this book. My hope is that MtCC becomes one of the foundational texts that new and training clinicians read, as it provides such a pragmatic framework for understanding clinical interactions. I would put this book in the same company as texts like “Motivational Interviewing”, in providing therapists with a solid footing in their sessions. Similarly I would recommend this book to experienced therapists: there’s a wealth of ideas to explore and wrestle with here. This book may just transform your approach to clinical conversations.



How to run Acceptance and Commitment Therapy groups for people with psychosis – paper published

Excellent to have an “in practice” paper published in the Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science:

Butler, L., Johns, L.C., Byrne, M., Joseph, C., O’Donoghue, E., Jolley, S., Morris, E.M. and Oliver, J.E., 2015. Running acceptance and commitment therapy groups for psychosis in community settings. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science.


In this paper, we discuss the practice implications of our group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for psychosis (ACTp) evaluations, in terms of the adaptations required to ACT interventions for group implementation in routine services for people with psychosis. ACTp shows promise as a brief individual intervention for people with psychosis to improve recovery, reduce future relapse, and reduce healthcare costs. Outcomes for group ACT interventions for non- psychotic severe mental illnesses support the potential for further cost-savings, through group delivery, and two recent trials suggest that adapting group ACT interventions to suit people with psychosis is both feasible and clinically effective. Trials were run from 2010-2014, and included people with psychosis and caregivers. Qualitative feedback was collected from group participants and service user co-facilitators. Based on this experience, we recommend psychosis- specific content for group interventions, and highlight process considerations to accommodate the particular needs of people with psychosis and their caregivers. With these adaptations, group ACTp can be feasible, acceptable, and effective as a routine frontline intervention in services for people with psychosis, however; this work is in the preliminary stages and further research is needed to consolidate the evidence base.

The pre-pub manuscript of the paper can be accessed here.

Our research team are currently writing a book-length guide to running ACT for Recovery groups, to be published by New Harbinger in 2016. Check out this link for a demonstration on how we run the “Passengers on the Bus” exercise, a central experience in the groups.


LinkFest! Top 10 Links – December 2015

The top ten most-clicked links from my Twitter account in December 2015:

1] Evaluations of self-referential thoughts and their association with components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

ACT-consistent variables were associated with thought evaluations (believability, discomfort & willingness) rather than thought content; believability associated with greater psychological inflexibility and distress; believability of negative thoughts a partial mediator in the prediction of distress.

2] Feasibility & acceptability of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group intervention for people with psychosis

Paper from my research team, describing our first ACT groups study with people recovering from psychosis. Our core group exercises use the ACT classic metaphor“Passengers on the Bus” (click here for a how-to).

3] Using Brief Cognitive Restructuring & Cognitive Defusion Techniques to Cope With Negative Thoughts

What happens when you ask people to use cognitive restructuring or defusion with a personally-important negative thought, over 5 days? This important study explores the effect of these ways of managing negative thoughts, in terms of believability, discomfort, negativity, and willingness to experience the thoughts.

4] Terrorism as an act-in-context: A contextual behavioral science account [book chapter]

Understanding terrorism through the lens of contextual behavioural science; considering the implications of Relational Frame Theory, what strategies could policy makers take?

5] The Application of #Mindfulness in Coping With Intrusive Thoughts

Presented from a CBT and transdiagnostic perspective, the authors demonstrate how brief mindfulness skills can be incorporated in sessions to help clients with intrusive thoughts.

[You don’t even need to call it A-C-T. Just CBT will do: Contextual Behaviour Therapy]

6] Acceptance & Commitment Therapy: helping parents of children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorders (video)

Dr Louise McHugh (University College Dublin, Ireland) describes the key concepts of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and outlines the studies demonstrating how this approach can help parents of children diagnosed with ASD.

7] Early in-session predictors of response to trauma-focused cognitive therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder

What client behaviours predict poor outcomes in trauma-focused CBT?

8] Preliminary Evaluation of the Values Tracker: 2-Item Measure of Engagement in Valued Activities

A promising new brief measure of valuing (2 items!), validated with participants experiencing chronic pain.

9] Impact of CBT and Acceptance & Commitment Therapy Models Using Psychology Trainee Therapists

Beginning therapists were trained in ACT and traditional CBT, and engaged a client in each approach (randomly determined). Client symptom improvements were greater using ACT; processes of change associated with each model predicted outcomes; compared to doing CBT, therapists were more fearful and felt less knowledgeable while doing ACT. [sounds legit: the ACT therapist is an uncomfortable therapist!]

10] Pushed by Symptoms, Pulled by Values: Promotion Goals Increase Motivation in Therapeutic Tasks

Experimental study investigating analogues of two therapeutic goals (reducing symptoms or pursuing values-based behaviours), using a regulatory focus theory framework. Participants who construed treatment in terms of valued behavior promotion spent more time on a therapeutic task than the other experimental conditions. [consistent with other experimental studies on valuing contexts, e.g., Paez-Blarrina, et al., 2008].


Wearing It Differently: Talking about ACT for psychosis, clinical psychology, and career choices

I recently had the privilege of being interviewed for “We All Wear It Differently”, a podcast for early career psychologists.

Amy Felman, the enthusiastic host, created the podcast so that psychologists starting their careers could learn from experienced colleagues about the choices and opportunities that shaped their working lives.

The podcast features a collection of Australian psychologists, describing their careers in areas like neuropsychology, school psychology, sport psychology, and clinical psychology.

Amy skilfully interviews psychologists about the early experiences that led to their career directions, the big ideas in psychology that enthuse them, and advice they have for those starting their careers. It is really interesting to hear what motivates psychologists, the range of roles that they perform, and what sustains them during challenging times.

The podcast is the type of resource I wish had been around when I was starting out in clinical psychology [we can safely say I trained in a “pre-pod” age…]. Amy also hosts an active community of listeners through a Facebook group.

For my contribution, I talk about the personal experiences that motivated me to work in services for people with psychosis, the psychologists who inspire me, what it was like to train in Western Australia and then work in the UK for 15 years, and how Acceptance and Commitment Therapy continues to inspire me as a progressive empirical approach in clinical psychology.

You can listen to the podcast episode here.  Better still, subscribe to the podcast – there’s a bunch of great episodes!


LinkFest! Top 10 links – October 2015

The top ten most-clicked links from my Twitter account in October 2015:

1] Steve Hayes discusses the future of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy – The Situation Has Clearly Changed: So What Are We Going to Do About It?

Whether or not you agree with him, when Steve Hayes writes about challenges in the broader CBT field, people read what he has to say!

2] What do you want your life to stand for? A collection of online values exercises

A blog post, based on Jason Luoma’s collection of online values tools, including some handy videos.

3] Playing it safe: why therapists don’t do exposure [new post]

Blog post describing a recent study, which showed that therapist experiential avoidance plays a role in how much CBT therapists offer exposure.

4] The Biomedical Model of Psychological Problems [Special issue of the Behavior Therapist; PDF]

This special issue of The Behavior Therapist has a veritable “who’s who” of researchers and thinkers critiquing the biomedical model, and describing psychological alternatives

5] Mechanisms of change: Exploratory outcomes from a RCT of acceptance and commitment therapy for anxious adolescents

Mechanisms papers always get plenty of interest, CBT, ACT or otherwise. First ACT mechanisms paper I’ve seen with this population.

6] What contributes to therapeutic confidence for clinical psychologists?

Interesting experience of training paper.

7] It’s complicated: relation between cognitive change methods, cognitive change, & symptom change in Cognitive Therapy for depression

Great mechanisms paper – demonstrating how tricky it is to test processes of change in therapy. Plenty to consider for psychotherapy research, cognitive therapy or otherwise.

8] Feasibility & acceptability of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group intervention for people with psychosis

 Paper from my research team, describing our first ACT groups study.

9] Therapeutic Alliance Predicts Outcomes of CBT but Not Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depressive Symptoms

Perhaps “therapeutic alliance” measures something other than the alliance?

10] Integrating self-care instruction into professional psychology training using Acceptance & Commitment Therapy

Overview of some impressive work being done by Kenneth Pakenham and colleagues at the University of Queensland. Important implications for the training of clinical psychologists.


Playing it safe: why therapists don’t do exposure

Therapy involves lots of decisions. Which interventions are introduced by the therapist – and when – can be influenced by a number of factors. Recent studies suggest some of this decision making is to do with how willing the therapist is to experience distress – either the client’s or their own (or, indeed, both!).

In a previous post I suggested that therapist experiential avoidance* may play a role in the low rates of exposure being offered by therapists in clinical practice. This is despite the solid evidence base for offering exposure as a core component of CBT for anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Unfortunately, even among therapists well-trained in CBT, there may be limited use of exposure.

A recent paper supports this perspective:

Scherr, S. R., Herbert, J. D., & Forman, E. M. (2015). The role of therapist experiential avoidance in predicting therapist preference for exposure treatment for OCD. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(1), 21-29.


Despite the overwhelming evidence that the behavioral components of cognitive-behavior therapies (CBTs) are critical for patient improvement, particularly in the case of anxiety disorders, there remains a wide gap between science and practice in their consistent use. In particular, exposure therapy for anxiety is under-used, even among self-proclaimed cognitive-behavior therapists. Some have speculated that this under-use is related to therapist discomfort with and avoidance of the temporary increase in distress that patients often experience during exposure therapy, and the secondary distress that this may cause in therapists themselves. Recent studies have begun to examine therapist characteristics that are associated with the use of evidence-based psychotherapies, but this research has focused on evidence-based practice as a whole rather than on specific interventions such as exposure, and have not addressed therapist psychological variables. We examined the role of therapists׳ experiential avoidance in the hypothetical use of exposure-based interventions to treat fictional patients for whom exposure therapy is clearly indicated. A total of 172 therapists watched simulated therapy intake sessions and were asked to designate the percentage of time they would allot toward various therapeutic modalities, including exposure. Results suggested that participants exhibiting higher experiential avoidance tended to allot less time to exposure therapy for the fictional patient. Additional therapist personality factors, such as intuitive personality style and attitudes toward evidence-based treatments, were associated with self-reported use of exposure therapy as well.

In this study, the participants were therapists who self-identified as having a CBT orientation. The majority of the CBT therapist participants were psychology trainees or qualified psychologists (a doctoral-level US sample), limiting investigation of differences across disciplines.

The research team used a neat method of assessing therapist choices – showing video vignettes of the intake interviews of fictional clients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, and then asking therapists to indicate how much time they would spend using various methods to help these clients (from CBT, and other approaches). (The clients’ clinical presentations were independently rated by experts as indicating the use of exposure as the treatment of choice). [This sounds like an excellent method to assess the clinical judgement of trainee therapists!]

It was found that therapists who were scored higher in experiential avoidance allotted less time to exposure: the result held whether or not the therapist was inexperienced (licensed psychologists high in EA showed similar decision making). The authors report several secondary analyses, suggesting that in this sample:
• therapists who were more favourable to evidence-based practice tended to be less experientially avoidant;
• therapists who were more intuitive in personality style tended to allot less time to exposure, be less favourable to evidence-based practice, and were more experientially avoidant; [an intuitive style does not mean being open to distressing experiences… or evidence, it seems!]

Several clinical implications are discussed in this paper, including the potential for training CBT therapists in greater awareness, openness and flexibility to uncomfortable feelings, to promote persistence in using evidence-based practice. The authors also suggest that the process of conducting exposure with clients may be helpful for therapists. By learning to tolerate client distress, along with their own uncomfortable feelings, therapists may become more psychologically flexible in their role. Seeing clients improve in this learning context, may increase therapist confidence in offering exposure as part of CBT.

This paper encourages me to think that in my role – supervising psychologists in training – it may be useful to find ways to promote psychological flexibility for my trainees.

Helping trainee psychologists to be open to their experiences, particularly the discomfort of inviting clients to step into feared situations, and finding ways to “flexibly persist” with offering exposure, may increase the likelihood that they offer evidence-based interventions later in their career.

If you are a therapist, what is your experience of doing exposure? Please share your comments and views below.

Also: check out my post on how training in psychological flexibility can help therapists here

* experiential avoidance =  attempts to reduce distressing thoughts, feelings, or other negative subjective experiences even when doing so is ineffective and causes problems. Experiential avoidance is amplifies suffering and contributes to a range of problems.


What is it that you care about? Online Values Exercises and Videos

What is it that you care about? And what do you want your life to stand for?

These are pretty typical questions asked when you are engaged in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.

The choices and actions we take, deliberately, mindfully, as life directions, can provide meaning and purpose… even when we are faced with unwanted and troubling feelings, thoughts and urges.

Recently on the ACT for Professionals mailing list, Jason Luoma (Portland Psychotherapy Clinic) shared a great set of links to online values exercises.

Jason stated that he had been searching for resources that focused mainly on values, and were totally self contained/ self explanatory (rather than needing a therapist or trainer to guide you through them).

Below is the list of resources, along with a few additions of my own (including some video links).

In this video, David Gillanders (University of Edinburgh) describes values as chosen life directions, and the choices and actions we can take through practicing willingness and mindfulness:

And finally… Russ Harris has been busy, producing new videos for his online training venture. Here are a couple: 1) about the difference between a life focused on values vs one focused on goals, and 2) the Choice Point, a way of noticing moments where you can take valued actions.

What values exercises have you found useful?  Do you know of other online resources that help with values work?

Please feel free to comment below!


How to do Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in groups: the Passengers on the Bus metaphor

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy frequently involves engaging participants in experiential exercises and metaphors. These metaphors can really have impact when they are acted out, instead of simply being described and talked about in a session. Using physical movement is a great way of doing this, as participants can relate to moving toward and away, struggling and letting go, being disconnected and connected, moving deliberately in a direction etc. Great examples of “physicalising” metaphors include Russ Harris’ clipboard exercise, Tug of War with the Monster, and JoAnne Dahl and colleagues’ Life Line exercise.

There is a terrific new resource available, a video demonstration of how to lead the Passengers on the Bus metaphor in a group format (below). This has been produced by the BABCP ACT Special Interest Group and is based on the “ACT for Recovery” study, recently conducted in South London (I was on the research team). Our study engaged people recovering from psychosis and carers in 6 group sessions, with “Passengers…” being a central metaphor. In group sessions we introduce participants to the metaphor, show an animation (another useful resource, below and available here), and then invite participants to act out the metaphor, using their own experiences and valued directions. The randomised controlled trial of this intervention has shown promising well-being outcomes.

Joe Oliver has provided a detailed description of the steps to do this exercise in a group, taken from our ACT for Recovery treatment manual.The video, plus the instructions, will give you an excellent framework for running this exercise in your group work.

We are pleased to share that our manual will be published by New Harbinger Publications in 2016, with updated content, including new illustrations, and details on how to train peer supporters and professionals in running successful ACT groups.

What are your experiences of doing this exercise?  Please feel free to comment below or contact us.